Skip to content

Evidence changelog

When the evidence changes, the public record should say why.

This log covers evidence framing, artifact publication, and known gaps. It does not retroactively turn a publisher summary into a raw source record.

Evidence presentation v0.1

Evidence levels and known gaps separated

  • Prepared a public evidence index, publication protocol, and LAVIDGE evidence pack.
  • Separated raw source artifacts, signed publisher summaries, and hosted model observations.
  • Narrowed LAVIDGE to the published matrix: Perplexity #1, Grok #2, Gemini #3, Claude #4, ChatGPT surfaced.
  • Removed unsupported duration and aggregate-prompt framing from the Top10Lists.us public copy.
  • Kept the V Digital Services prompt mismatch and 2026-07-22 ChatGPT omission in the visible sequence.
Signed summaries v1

Three Ed25519 case summaries created

  • Published signed JSON summaries for LAVIDGE, Aker Ink, and V Digital Services.
  • Published the standalone Node verifier and referenced the AnswerShare public JWKS.
  • The summaries were generated from AnswerShare's canonical case-study copy; they are not provider-original model receipts.
Open gaps

Source material still needed

  • LAVIDGE: historic raw responses, screenshots, absolute observation dates, and a public baseline.
  • Aker Ink: raw prior and later Gemini responses, model version, timestamp, screenshot, and elapsed window.
  • V Digital Services: direct public links to the 30-file baseline pack and raw 2026-07-16 outputs.
  • Top10Lists.us: provider-original run receipts and a reconciled date for the hosted assessments.

Versioning rule

Correct the statement. Preserve the reason.

A material prompt, model, rubric, collection-window, or interpretation change creates a new entry. Earlier artifacts remain identifiable, and current copy links to the statement the evidence can support now.

Read the protocol